What is the LaMusga case and why should I care?

A divorce case that went all the way up to the Supreme Court of California.

This may not be a famous case to you, but if you are in the middle of figuring out custody and visitation issues related to you or your spouse moving away, this is a case you must know about. It is important to know about the case law history that has set the precedent in California for how judges make decisions about these issues.


In Marriage of LaMusga, the court clarified factors that the trial court should take into consideration when determining the best interests of a child in move-away cases.


The factors resulting from this case include:

v The child’s interest in stability and continuity in the custodial arrangement

v The distance of the move

v The age of the child

v The child’s relationship with both parents

v The wishes of the child if he or she is mature enough

v The reasons for the proposed move

v The extent to which the parents are sharing custody

v The relationship between the parents, including but not limited to:

- The parents’ ability to communicate and cooperate effectively

- The parents’ willingness to put the interested of the child above their

individual interests.


In Marriage of LaMusga, the mother, who was the custodial parent, wanted to move the children away from their home in California to Ohio. The Supreme Court recognized in this case that the noncustodial parent who wants to make a change to the primary custody bears the burden of providing proof regarding the proposed move away.

So, what that means is that the parent who does not have custody will be required to show proof about the impact of the custodial parent’s move. In this case, the noncustodial parent, the father, needed to prove the detriment the children would experience in order to prevent the move away and keep the children in California. In Marriage of La Musga, the Supreme Court affirmed the custody order of the lower court that denied the mother’s move because the father presented proof that relocating the children to Ohio, 2000 miles from California, would be detrimental to their welfare. The court made their decision on the effect the proposed move would have on the already rocky relationship between the children and their father and concluded that the proposed move would be detrimental to the children’s welfare because it would disrupt the progress the children were making in promoting the relationship with their father.

As you can see, there are numerous factors the court takes into consideration when determining child custody with move-away cases. An experienced family lawyer can go over your case and explain how the above factors can apply to the move-away in your case. These are difficult cases and you must be well-informed before making any decisions about a move-away case.

We are here to help you, so please feel free to get in touch with any questions you may have about custody and move-away cases. (909) 377-8141


This Blog/Website is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site, you understand that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.


#californiafamilylaw #coparenting #visitation #childcustody #divorce #parentage #moveaway

ca_upland_divorce-attorney_2020_transpar
Wealth-Counsel-Logo.jpg

Meza Talbott Law is a sole proprietorship. DISCLAIMER: The information you obtain on this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us so that we may assist you in your family law or estate planning matter.

© 2019 by Meza Talbott Law